Good videos, with context.
Oxide and Friends 7/3/2023 -- Shipping the first Oxide rack: Your questions answered!

Oxide and Friends 7/3/2023 -- Shipping the first Oxide rack: Your questions answered!

Oxide Computer Company
2 HN recommenders · discussed 2023–2025
Open YouTube ↗

About this video

A two-hour Oxide and Friends session answering questions after shipping the first Oxide rack. Topics include making hardware as a startup and why Oxide chose illumos.

Why it appears in the archive

HN cites it as Oxide's own explanation of how they ship hardware as a startup and why they picked illumos.

AI-generated summary and labels from the source dataset; verify important details against the video. Source & credits.

From the Hacker News discussion

faitswulff · 2023-07 · rec

One benefit is that they're competing in an industry where the time to get a sled up and running for compute can be measured in weeks (they say they've heard up to 90 days) whereas their solution is basically plug and play - Bryan was trying to get Steve to admit set up took "hours" whereas Steve was hedging and saying customers could get started "within a week." They go into more details on their podcast, and this section in particular covers the bootstrap time: [VIDEO] Pretty fascinating stuff.

Read original comment ↗
cnst · 2025-08 · rec

> [VIDEO] Great episode! The Dell PERC "parity issue" "you're the only customer having this issue" story is hilarious, reminds me of my own experience getting support over the years as a non-Windows user! Sadly, today, "non-Windows" is simply being replaced with "non-Linux", so, if you run BSD or Illumos, it's still the same issues. Oxide Computer is great, I really do hope they succeed, because it does seem like an uphill battle!

Read original comment ↗
bcantrill · 2023-07 · reference

We have talked quite a bit about what it's like to be making hardware as a startup in our Oxide and Friends podcast[0] -- and one might be especially interested in the Q&A we did on Monday[1] after our launch got quite a bit of attention here on HN.[2] [0] [LINK] [1] [VIDEO] [2] [LINK]

Read original comment ↗
bcantrill · 2023-07 · reference

Yes! There are lots of ways in which we are nothing like these big IBM systems (we are, for example, entirely open -- like POWER, but very unlike AS/400 or Z series machines), but we definitely admire the robustness of these machines! Indeed, arguably to a fault, as I likened us to the AS/400 in a VC pitch[0] -- which (despite the potential accuracy of the historical analogue) is as ill-advised as it sounds... [0] [VIDEO]

Read original comment ↗
bcantrill · 2023-07 · reference

Not unrelated, of course -- but it was certainly not the foregone conclusion that you might expect![0] [0] [VIDEO]

Read original comment ↗
bcantrill · 2024-01 · reference

Keep in mind that Helios is really just an implementation detail of the rack; like Hubris[0], it's not something visible to the user or to applications. (The user of the rack provisions VMs.) As for why an illumos derivative and not something else, we expanded on this a bit in our Q&A when we shipped our first rack[1] -- and we will expand on it again in the (recorded) discussion that we will have later today.[2] [0] [LINK] [1] [VIDEO] [2] [LINK]

Read original comment ↗
ubedan · 2025-08 · reference

"There’s a big difference between mostly dead and all dead. ... Now, mostly dead is slightly alive. Now, all dead…well, with all dead, there’s usually only one thing that you can do." I personally believe that illumos will survive for decades, and it very well could rise again for those users that want/need robust stability. One particularly notable design win was Oxide Computer Company as their hypervisor. They published their reasoning for choosing illumos here: [LINK] [VIDEO]

Read original comment ↗