
Corruption is Legal in America
About this video
A short RepresentUs explainer arguing that US politics is shaped by money, citing the Gilens and Page Princeton study on how little average citizens influence policy.
Why it appears in the archive
Frequently linked as a compact summary of the Princeton study when commenters argue Congress ignores public opinion.
AI-generated summary and labels from the source dataset; verify important details against the video. Source & credits.
From the Hacker News discussion
Today somebody on Reddit linked to this video which talks about the process of money influencing politics [VIDEO] It doesn't discuss the role of the judicial system. It's all about the legislative aspects of US government. It's pretty compelling and well made. Hopefully a bipartisan movement can have some impact. The video was made by [LINK]
Read original comment ↗I think this video will encourage you. Well actually maybe it will discourage you, but the follow up video will encourage you :D Corruption is Legal in America: [VIDEO]
Read original comment ↗Most voters aren't relevant anymore. Princeton confirmed it in a study earlier this year. It's neatly summed up here: [VIDEO]
Read original comment ↗Corruption is a world-wide problem and that includes all nations. Corruption is Legal in America [Video] [VIDEO]
Read original comment ↗Those two issues are orthogonal to each other. On some plane of understanding, business executives understand that lack of money makes commerce grind to a halt. It's a form of tragedy of the commons, in monetary philosophy. Henry Ford understood this concept; it's why he paid his people well to make cars... which his workers bought. > there is no discourse on how to handle everyone when nobody needs to work. I was in haste in that sentence. Things like UBI are being discussed. However, the flip-side is the actual actions that grind down the worker to a 'nothing': robotic/computer work is ideal for every job, to the minds of the Silicon Valley exec. UBI/Minimum Income: It's been given a many great names through the years. But it's understood as a way for everyone to receive the basic necessities of life, plus a bit more. But this idea requires buy-in of the population at large. Or at least, buy in from the "rich" ( [VIDEO] ) The problem with Silicon Valley is that they have an assumption this either this already exists somehow, or it will magically appear. What instead happens, is that people lose jobs, wages are forced yet lower and lower, and the human is removed carte blanche in the favor of unpaid robotic labor. On an individual company level, this helps the bottom line of the company (race to the bottom). However, when this idea is expanded to wider and wider areas, it gentrifies the owner class away from everyone else. For in that eventuality, not even upper class jobs e
Read original comment ↗The people who were funding Trump/Hillary were funding them equally. Is doesn't matter who won, they banks, oil companies and large media conglomerates still control the country like they have for the past several decades. I see in our future ... the exact same presidency. More US led wars. More predator drones. More CIA guns and money to fund revolutions that we then fight with out predator drones. Just remember the election is like Whose Line is it Anyway, the points are all made up and none of it matters. [VIDEO]
Read original comment ↗You don't really have a say in the US, at least. Laws pass 30% of the time, whether the voters love it or hate it: [VIDEO]
Read original comment ↗For anyone doubting the absolute veracity of this comment, here's a 5 minutes video on how laws are made in America: [VIDEO]
Read original comment ↗