Good videos, with context.
U.S. Territories: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)

U.S. Territories: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)

LastWeekTonight
2 HN recommenders · discussed 2015–2019
Open YouTube ↗

About this video

A Last Week Tonight segment on how century-old Supreme Court decisions left U.S. territories such as Puerto Rico, Guam and American Samoa without meaningful representation. It mixes comedy with a history of their legal status.

Why it appears in the archive

HN people use it as a quick, entertaining primer on territory status, citizenship versus nationality, and voting rights.

AI-generated summary and labels from the source dataset; verify important details against the video. Source & credits.

From the Hacker News discussion

javiramos · 2017-10 · rec

Puerto Rican here! In my opinion, these are two very good pieces to learn about Puerto Rico [1] [VIDEO] [2] [LINK]

Read original comment ↗
nickpsecurity · 2018-04 · rec

That's a harsh interpretation to make of dragonwriter's comment. I read it as a factual statement about what the U.S. does with colonies by someone that probably disagrees with the practice. That's also a charitable default. If anyone wants more info on the topic, John Oliver has a great, 13-min segment on U.S. territories along with the clearly-evil justifications for their situation. Wait till yall see the Supreme Court ruling. It should get way more attention in media discussions on this topic. His finale with America's Got Talent contestant is also an epic counter to that. [VIDEO]

Read original comment ↗
i_don_t_know · 2015-06 · reference

Maybe it refers to US nationals as opposed to US citizens. For example, the people of American Samoa and Guam are US nationals but not US citizens, at least not automatically. But I don't know what all the differences between the two categories are. Reference: [VIDEO]

Read original comment ↗
jack9 · 2016-03 · reference

There's one citizen type in-between the natural and naturalized (and below), it's the natural citizen in a US Territory. No votes for you. [VIDEO]

Read original comment ↗
nickpsecurity · 2016-09 · reference

If they become citizens, they can vote. They might be likely as a whole to vote for or against things that bother certain groups in Congress. That by itself will be a reason for those parties to prevent them from being citizens. We see the same thing with the islanders. [VIDEO]

Read original comment ↗
Keverw · 2019-10 · reference

The whole one China policy has always been confusing to me, but haven't done too much research. Taiwan, Hong Kong and China each have different entry requirements for example for visiting, yet they are supposed to be the same country? I guess it has to do with control after their civil war though, but confusing for people who haven't been following the whole story. They are not separate, yet they are separate is like some sort of double speak. But the US has some confusing things too going on, like people from American Samoa are considered US nationals but they aren't US Citizens. They still get US passports, but can't vote, etc. I guess they aren't technically citizens of any country then but aren't completely stateless since still considered a national. It's like they aren't really citizens anywhere but are kinda like a half citizen in a way since they still get a passport. John Oliver did a segment on this, [VIDEO]

Read original comment ↗