Good videos, with context.
Inside the Lab Where Robots Run Their Own Experiments

Inside the Lab Where Robots Run Their Own Experiments

Seeker
0 HN recommenders · discussed 2021–2024
Open YouTube ↗

About this video

A Seeker short documentary on a lab where robots run experiments with almost no human intervention, covering automation and active machine learning in drug discovery and synthetic biology.

Why it appears in the archive

HN cites it as an example of automated cloud labs and AI already running physical experiments.

AI-generated summary and labels from the source dataset; verify important details against the video. Source & credits.

From the Hacker News discussion

davnn · 2021-01 · reference

The fun thing is that there are approaches that want to go beyond this kind of methodological description of a scientific process to code [0, 1]. In general I would say that the more we can remove the human aspect and inherent ambiguity of science, the better for reproducibility. See [2] for a couple of examples. [0] [LINK] [1] [LINK] [2] [VIDEO]

Read original comment ↗
strateospeter · 2022-08 · reference

Strateos | Senior Software Engineer (Ruby on Rails) | Remote within US* | Full-Time Strateos is a life sciences company that uses remote control and automated cloud labs. Our mission is to create new knowledge driven by data, computation, artificial intelligence, automation software, and high-throughput robotics with the goal of fundamentally advancing the life sciences. Check out this Seeker video to learn more: [VIDEO] We are looking for a backend Senior Software Engineer fluent in Rails and experienced with Java. VISA sponsorship is available. *Employees can work remotely from CA, WA, NY, TX, OR, AZ, IL, NC, MA, DE, OH, VT, MN, VA. Feel free to apply via email ([email protected]) or directly on our website. [LINK]

Read original comment ↗
fennecbutt · 2024-03 · reference

Which will be so amazing. But there is already ai running physical experiments: [VIDEO] But it has been done for at lest a decade or so I think

Read original comment ↗