Good videos, with context.
Richard Dawkins demonstrates laryngeal nerve of the giraffe

Richard Dawkins demonstrates laryngeal nerve of the giraffe

MysOxen
1 HN recommenders · discussed 2012–2024
Open YouTube ↗

About this video

A clip from Channel 4's Inside Nature's Giants in which Richard Dawkins shows the recurrent laryngeal nerve of the giraffe during a dissection. The nerve takes a long detour down the neck and back up.

Why it appears in the archive

HN uses it as the canonical example that evolution is not optimal and can get stuck in local maxima.

AI-generated summary and labels from the source dataset; verify important details against the video. Source & credits.

From the Hacker News discussion

ufo · 2024-09 · rec

The blog post recommended the TV show "inside nature's giants", and I second it. The bit about the recurrent laryngeal nerve of the giraffe is particulary memorable: [VIDEO]

Read original comment ↗
ChrisNorstrom · 2012-12 · reference

A rule of thumb is not a law. Form doesn't always follow function even in nature and evolution: [VIDEO] Also styles and fads like "minimalism" and "flat design" are forms that do not follow function but are really forms that enforce function. Which is why they're fads and go away after enough people jump on the bandwagon and realize the fad's flaw and limitations.

Read original comment ↗
adevine · 2016-01 · reference

Evolution most certainly DOES get stuck in local maxima: [VIDEO] . Also, it's quite easy for me to imagine an animal like an angel, with arms and wings. Tetrapods only have 4 limbs to work with though. For bats to gain wings they had to lose their front legs.

Read original comment ↗
fhoffa · 2017-03 · reference

Good catch. It seems like an artifact of working and editing a query until they got what they wanted - certainly not a BigQuery restriction. (like this [VIDEO] ) Note that the published query scans 2.25 TB of data. While impressive, for a better workflow and cost management I would split it into a 2 step process: - First extract all the files I'm interested in to a separate table (all pom.xmls?). - Then run whatever analysis you want over those files.

Read original comment ↗