Good videos, with context.
Tesla Model 3's motor - The Brilliant Engineering behind it

Tesla Model 3's motor - The Brilliant Engineering behind it

Sabin Civil Engineering
2 HN recommenders · discussed 2020–2022
Open YouTube ↗

About this video

An engineering explainer on why Tesla abandoned the induction motor for the Model 3 and used an IPM-SynRM design. It covers the reluctance torque and permanent magnet principles behind the choice.

Why it appears in the archive

HN recommends it as a clear explanation of the Model 3 motor and reluctance rotor design.

AI-generated summary and labels from the source dataset; verify important details against the video. Source & credits.

From the Hacker News discussion

sorenjan · 2020-12 · rec

Youtube has recommended a few videos from the channel Learn Engineering that have been surprisingly good. For example: [VIDEO]

Read original comment ↗
londons_explore · 2022-08 · rec

A tesla Model 3 motor already is partially a reluctance motor. This youtube video describes it rather well, and I'd recommend giving it a watch [1]. Notice the air gaps - thats the reluctance part of the rotor. [1]: [VIDEO]

Read original comment ↗
iknowstuff · 2021-04 · reference

> The engineers of Tesla motor's shocked everyone when they abandoned the versatile induction motor in Model 3 cars. They used a totally different motor called IPM-SynRM. Let's understand why the Tesla engineers made this crucial design change. [VIDEO]

Read original comment ↗
b3nji · 2022-08 · reference

> A tesla Model 3 motor already is partially a reluctance motor. This youtube video describes it rather well, and I'd recommend giving it a watch [1]. Notice the air gaps - thats the reluctance part of the rotor. > [1]: [VIDEO] I dont think he's using air gaps? "Instead of using air gaps, Sansone thought he could incorporate another magnetic field into a motor."

Read original comment ↗
ilyt · 2022-11 · reference

> What sort of motor do you think a Tesla model 3 uses, for example? IPM-SynRM [VIDEO] They went into a lot of effort to optimize it over RPM range. If you want to make a point use real motor curves at least. Your graph suggests it goes to sub 20% efficiencies at low speed which is completely false and would suggests way higher gains from gearbox than in reality. Hell, it would suggest ICE like performance, it's THAT bad.

Read original comment ↗