Avoiding Microservice Megadisasters - Jimmy Bogard

[VIDEO] (39:00) Conway's law: Any organization that designs a system (defined broadly) will produce a design whose structure is a copy of the organization's communication structure. Jimmy's law: A broken, dysfunctional organization driven by meeting unhealthy goals and metrics will produce broken, dysfunctional systems. Inverse Conway Maneuver: Design the organization you want, the architecture will follow, kicking and screaming.

It is such a weird feeling to come across a topic I haven't read on in a while, watch two videos on it out of random curiosity, hop on hackernews the next day, and get a recommendation for the exact same videos. I very much enjoyed the 5 techniques and many of the tidbits. I also liked "Avoiding Microservice Megadisasters" but mostly for the entertainment value ( [VIDEO] )

As your average developer who's heard architects mention these micro-frontends, I would have liked the article to start off by listing the use cases and trade-offs instead of jumping right on the hype train at full speed. Since the article mentions Piral, I thought I would peruse that project's documentation (0), but am none the wiser on basic questions like: how do components get assembled into the main application, is network traffic overhead is going to be a problem, etc. Delving further into the Piral docs, I came across a link to a sample micro-frontend (1) that seems to be importing every micro-frontend into the index, so network traffic overhead seems like it could be an issue. Does anyone here have experience with these in a production environment and know how to avoid (in my mind) basic pitfalls like these? As it stands, this article seems to be setting people up for scenarios like the Bell micro-services disaster (2) [0] [LINK] [1] [LINK] [2] [VIDEO]