Zig 2026: No-AI Policy, $670K Foundation, Left GitHub & Why Zig Isn’t 1.0 - Andrew Kelley Explains

If you're unsure about spending the time to learn Zig, I really recommend watching the following interview with the creator of Zig [VIDEO] convinced me more than any design doc or blogpost could

I recommend you to watch Andrew Kelly interview[0], while I'm not the target audience of Zig, I don't see him driving away any user. Also Jai as for now is a non existing language, just a selected few has access to it, but Jai approach is a kitchen sink, from what I saw it is all over the place in terms of features, now Zig vision feels cohesive. [0] [VIDEO]

I’d prefer that you watch this video interview with Andrew Kelley. He is describing that. [VIDEO] Personal thoughts: I think Zig will become more stable once 1.0 tag released. Currently I cant find a fix to my error in net. But the folks on Zig Discord server helping me out.

I have the same feeling about Zig. In this interview [1], Andrew Kelley, creator of Zig, explains a lot of the features of the language; compares it against c, rust, go; and explains why he created the language. According to him, the killer feature of zig is the tool chain (compiler, linker, build system) since it has no dependencies. So, it will work in any OS/target you choose. It is a really interesting interview. However, Zig code is a bit hard for me to read. [1] [VIDEO]

TFA has an odd perspective. > Views are my own. I have no history with Zig. I’ve never spoken to Andrew Kelley There are better primary sources to explain what ZSF is trying to achieve with its AI stance. Kelley's rant [0] was a bit much but the ZSF AI Policy [1] and Kelley's interview on it [2] are interesting and informative. [0]: [LINK] [1]: [LINK] [2]: [VIDEO]

> It doesnt let you have unused variables Andrew Kelly on that: [VIDEO] Looks like you might be able to get rid of the error easily with annotations.

I've watched an interview with Andrew Kelley: [VIDEO] where he seemed much more chill and level-headed.