Good videos, with context.
Strange Spheres in Higher Dimensions - Numberphile

Strange Spheres in Higher Dimensions - Numberphile

Numberphile
2 HN recommenders · discussed 2020–2025
Open YouTube ↗

About this video

Matt Parker on Numberphile explains the strange properties of spheres in higher dimensions, such as how they poke out of their bounding boxes. It uses Pythagoras to build intuition for 4D and beyond.

Why it appears in the archive

Recommended whenever the counterintuitive geometry of high-dimensional spheres comes up, including in vector embedding discussions.

AI-generated summary and labels from the source dataset; verify important details against the video. Source & credits.

From the Hacker News discussion

magicalhippo · 2020-02 · rec

Generalizations to higher dimensions[1] also have some fun properties. For one, the volume of a n-dimensional sphere (ball) goes to zero as n goes to infinity. But not in a trivial way: given a radius r, you can find the number of dimensions n that maximizes the volume of the n-sphere. For r=1 it's 5 dimensions, but for r=3 it's 55 dimensions. Numberphile[2] has a video on higher dimensional spheres which talks about this weirdness. [1]: [LINK] [2]: [VIDEO]

Read original comment ↗
ithkuil · 2025-05 · rec

There is a good numberphile video about that [VIDEO] It contains also a hilarious reference to the "parker circle:.

Read original comment ↗
ithinkso · 2021-09 · reference

Oh they are very spike-y, well, my point in the above post is to just solve the eq but easier 'visualization' would be [0] By the way, this is a similar phenomena to the 'curse of dimensionality' [1] [0] [VIDEO] [1] [LINK]

Read original comment ↗
hn_throwaway_99 · 2021-10 · reference

Also not a topologist, but thought it was interesting after watching the video from the current top comment, [VIDEO] , where if you look at the size of the "contained sphere", 4D is the only place where the contained sphere is exactly tangent to the containing box. Lower than that, and it's easy to visualize how the contained sphere is smaller, higher than that, the contained sphere is always bigger. So seems like it might be a natural consequence that techniques that work at higher or lower dimensions don't work for the case in 4D where the sphere is exactly tangent.

Read original comment ↗