Visualizing video at the speed of light — one trillion frames per second

Since you are finding about femto-photo today, I think you are gonna love this: [LINK] [VIDEO] By the way. Femto laser are somewhat common nowadays. They are used in eye surgery and microscopy. I even seem papers talking about using them in finger print scanners! See Optical coherence tomography for more info.

The relevant video from MIT Media Lab is here: [VIDEO] > MIT researchers have created a new imaging system that can acquire visual data at a rate of one trillion exposures per second. That's fast enough to produce a slow-motion video of light traveling through objects. > [LINK]

For those curious, here is prior art from 12 years ago, capturing light in a coke bottle with a single streak camera. [VIDEO] [LINK] I remember when this dropped and where I was when I watched it and read the paper. One of the coolest things I'd ever seen. This seems like a great extension of the work. I'm okay with trading accuracy for crude usefulness as a model. Making this interactive and putting it in the hands of curious minds is the next step.

> There's zero purpose for having a bottle with any label. Light interacts quite differently with the label than the material of the bottle. We get to observe scattering, diffusion, color... y'know, science stuff. It is rather interesting that the first video (from 12 years ago) used a blank red label instead. (See how it differs in from the rest of the bottle? I particularly like how it obscures the pulse itself and highlights the wavefront on the surface.) [VIDEO]

It's quite realistic, here's the same thing without AI: [VIDEO] I still share your concern, however, particularly because they seem to be avoid moving the camera without time moving as well. I was expecting bullet-time!

Photons certainly appear to have a real physical location with 1e9 FPS imaging capabilities: "Visualizing video at the speed of light — one trillion frames per second" (2012) [VIDEO] But is there an identity function for a photon(s), and is "time-polarization" necessary for defining an identity function for photons?

It's an apples-to-oranges comparison, but I'm reminded of the ~10^12 fps (1.7 ps exposures) demonstrated in work at MIT[0], which was for a completely different application. [0] [LINK] EDIT: Video with explanation. [VIDEO]

The original MIT video from 2011: "Visualizing video at the speed of light — one trillion frames per second" [VIDEO] (project site: [LINK] ) He mentions this as the inspiration in his previous video ( [LINK] ).