Good videos, with context.
#VoCo. Adobe Audio Manipulator Sneak Peak with Jordan Peele | Adobe Creative Cloud

#VoCo. Adobe Audio Manipulator Sneak Peak with Jordan Peele | Adobe Creative Cloud

Adobe Creative Cloud
2 HN recommenders · discussed 2016–2024
Open YouTube ↗

About this video

Adobe's VoCo demo from the MAX 2016 Sneak Peeks, co-hosted by Jordan Peele, showing software that changes words in a voiceover by typing new ones.

Why it appears in the archive

HN cites it as the early example of voice cloning and audio deepfakes, with some recommending Peele's reaction and others calling the demo fake or never shipped.

AI-generated summary and labels from the source dataset; verify important details against the video. Source & credits.

From the Hacker News discussion

kmfrk · 2017-07 · rec

I really recommend the Adobe demonstration of their VoCo speech audio "photoshopping" because of Jordan Peele's reaction: [VIDEO] . More technology demos should have unscripted, sincere reactions like that.

Read original comment ↗
kmfrk · 2017-07 · rec

I really recommend the Adobe demonstration of their VoCo speech audio "photoshopping" because of Jordan Peele's reaction: [VIDEO] . More technology demo should have unscripted, sincere reactions like that.

Read original comment ↗
BrandoElFollito · 2018-01 · rec

The "Adobe Photoshop for voice" is quite amazing: [VIDEO] (you can skip the first ~third to get to the demo)

Read original comment ↗
felipemesquita · 2017-04 · reference

This site has a "demo" section featuring only Soundcloud clips. Uses to much the present tense "In a world first, Montreal-based startup Lyrebird today unveiled" and "Record 1 minute [...] and Lyrebird can [..]Use this key to generate anything" but has no actual product or beta version. Adobe had a much more impressive sneak peek of a similar product called VoCo: [VIDEO]

Read original comment ↗
JCharante · 2018-01 · reference

> and probably audio too I've grown to completely distrust audio recording ever since I found out about VoCo from Adobe[0]. I wonder how long until there's an open source alternative. [0] [VIDEO]

Read original comment ↗
minxomat · 2019-11 · reference

It's been 3 years since Adobe first showed off their voice impression and editing feature (unreleased): [VIDEO] Though this is very impressive, it seems to take longer and longer to make those tiny improvements that make all the difference wrt believability. N.B. The most convincing TTS I've ever heard (predating Lyre by quite a bit) generated things like this: [LINK]

Read original comment ↗
Zenst · 2019-12 · reference

Thinking ahead - will Hollywood in 50 years time be actor based or digital rights based when your film is computer rendered and you pick your own actors that get digitally placed. Effectively reducing actors to DLC! Remember, technology to fake voices has already be done. [VIDEO] Certainly interesting times ahead.

Read original comment ↗
jcims · 2021-11 · reference

There's two ways to think of this as a deepfake: 1 - This is an actual video of the guy in his home, but they changed/synthesized the audio and then worked on the lip movements to make it match. 2 - This is a video of an actor impersonating the guy, possibly to the extent of impersonating his voice (although his timbre might make that a little tricky), and then they just deepfake the face on to the actor. An example of this is deeptomcruise on TikTok, something that you should treat yourself to if you haven't seen yet - [LINK] (first two today aren't great, here's a good one - [LINK] ? ) I'm not even convinced there's any alteration here, but even if there was both of the above could be possible. Adobe demoed something called VoCo in 2016 that never saw the light of day, not sure if there is something approximating this available today: [VIDEO]

Read original comment ↗