Good videos, with context.
Copying Is Not Theft - Official Version

Copying Is Not Theft - Official Version

Question Copyright
6 HN recommenders · discussed 2010–2026
Open YouTube ↗

About this video

Nina Paley's one-minute animated free culture anthem with vocals by Connie Champagne, arguing that copying is not theft.

Why it appears in the archive

Linked constantly in copyright and piracy debates as a short explainer of the difference between copying and physical theft.

AI-generated summary and labels from the source dataset; verify important details against the video. Source & credits.

From the Hacker News discussion

vibragiel · 2010-12 · strong rec

When this video* was published, I thought the idea it tells was too obvious and well known, but time proved me wrong it seems. Please watch it. (*) [VIDEO]

Read original comment ↗
lince · 2013-02 · rec

Agree with you, except on the use of "steal". You steal when the owner lose the original. What happens in BitTorrent/FTP is copy. More about in copy is not theft video: [VIDEO]

Read original comment ↗
jra_samba · 2016-10 · rec

I can't believe people are still equating copyright infringement with physical theft. Didn't that tired old argument die a long time ago ? If not, why not ? One more time, boys and girls: [VIDEO]

Read original comment ↗
Matumio · 2022-01 · rec

Oh no, you are now required to watch this damned cartoon: [VIDEO] (A one minute ELI5 explanation about the difference between physical and intellectual property.)

Read original comment ↗
glerk · 2022-04 · rec

It’s been more than a decade since I had the opportunity to plug this educative video in an internet conversation: [VIDEO]

Read original comment ↗
autoexec · 2023-12 · rec

Which dictionary defines taking as simply gaining or acquiring something? If you "take" something from someone else it generally means that they no longer have what you took. This is all really pretty simple: [VIDEO] Also, (at least in the US) legally copyright infringement is distinct from stealing.

Read original comment ↗
wolfgke · 2015-07 · reference

> I am not familiar enough to say he did or didn't steal company property, but I would certainly not say that " there is no market for stolen code ". He hasn't stolen anything (since the source code is still on GS' computers), he just copied it illegaly. Using the word "stealing" for this is plain propaganda. > [VIDEO] [Copying Is Not Theft]

Read original comment ↗
hjek · 2018-12 · reference

It seems that this "manufacturing counterfeits" is literally just copying Windows CDs: > Lundgren made 28,000 of the discs and shipped them to a broker, who planned to sell them to computer refurbishing shops for about 25 cents each, so they could provide them to used-computer buyers. > Microsoft’s lawyers valued the discs at $25 each and said they represent $700,000 in potential sales. Firstly I think it's a harsh sentence (because copying isn't theft[0]), but secondly can anyone tell me why on earth he didn't just burn some Debian discs? (Perhaps with LXDE if it's really old computers.) [0]: [VIDEO]

Read original comment ↗